The Mystery of "Clara's Girl Ovations" Back to Jay Brooks' Daybook

The Mystery of "Clara's Girl Ovations"

Evergreen
Administrivia:
12 December 1987 to 12 December 1997: Ten years of ROOTS-L!
Search ten years of archived messages at: http://searches.rootsweb.com/roots-l.html

Clara Ada Morrow Brooks
Today's Topics:

  • Female question "Denise Fox"
  • Re: Female question "Tom Rue"
  • great grandma's book "Beverly Partee"
  • Re: female question "Jim & Barb Rigel"
  • Re: A Female Question... "Eugene W. Hubbard"
  • Your Roots Questions "Cheryl Cass"
  • Re: female question "catkinsn"
  • Ovations "Barbara Rivas"
  • female problems "Linda Harris"
  • Ovations "Eugene W. Hubbard"
    Clara's Girl Ovations
  • Grandma's book "Beverly Partee"
  • Female problems "K.S. Richards"
  • Clara's Girl Ovations "Jeanne Lee Cunningham"
  • Re: Clara's Girl Ovations "Tom Rue"
  • Re: Clara's Girl Ovations "Jeanne Lee Cunningham"
  • OVation "Barbara Rivas"
  • Periods, Ovations, and such "Barbara Rivas"
  • Women's lib / What did women do before "Scott, Mark S."
  • Periods and such "Barbara Rivas"
  • Grandpa's problem "Stephen Johnson"
  • Re: Grandpa's problem"John F. Chadler"
    Joseph Winfield Brooks, Jr.
  • Monthly pain "Beverly Partee"
  • This Woman Thang "Marie Bartholemew"
  • Pain relief "Gil & Sonia Murray"
  • Re: Grandpa's problem "Beverly Partee"
  • RE: Clara's Girl Ovations "LaWanda"
  • GRANDPA RAY'S LITTLE OUTHOUSE "Adonna Morgan"
  • Ovation "A. Morgan"
  • If you don't like the subject, don't read the message! "Kathleen"
  • Ovation, Outhouse?
  • Clara's girl ovations "Nan Harvey"
  • RE: Girl Ovations - I've got it! (I think, maybe..) "LaWanda"
  • RE: Pain Reliever - Monthly "LaWanda"
  • RE: Enough about Female problems "LaWanda"
  • ovations "Mark Cueni"
  • RE: Pain Reliever - Monthly "Jere Osburn"
  • RE: Girl Ovations - I've got it! (I think, maybe..) "Tom Rue"


    X-Message: #1
    Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 02:11:07 -0400
    From: "Denise Fox" [alpha@laker.net]
    Subject: female question

    This question is kind of off-the-wall.

    The more I research my female ancestors who were pioneers in Ohio in the early 1800's,(My family was in VA in the late 1600's and made their way to Ohio by 1822 ) I wonder what the women used at "that time of the month" Does anyone know?

    God knows there weren't any hygiene products, let alone Advil or Alleve or Pamprin. Please respond to me at alpha@laker.net. as I don't want to make everyone mad at me by asking this!

    Sorry, but I had to ask,
    Denise Bleichrodt-Fox


    X-Message: #2
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 09:19:00 -0400
    From: "Tom Rue" [rue@catskill.net]
    Subject: Re: female question

    Denise Fox wrote:
    >The more I research my female ancestors who were pioneers in Ohio in the early 1800's,
    >(My family was in VA in the late 1600's and made their way to Ohio by 1822 ) I wonder what
    >the women used at "that time of the month" <..>

    I had folks in Ohio (MILLER and COOPER lines) during the early 1800s. Your inquiry caught my attention http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/miller/.

    This reply isn't directly aimed at the question of what women used to collect menstrual blood before tampons, etc., or even Ohio ancestors, but at an unusual family document. A daybook left to me by my grandmother, which she said belonged to her father, Joseph Winfield BROOKS, contains a page with what I believe to be the handwriting of his wife, nee Clara Ada MORROW. A table entitled "Clara's Girl Ovations" [sic] contains notes of what I have always presumed to be her cycles from January 1909 to June 1913. Excerpts from the book, including the table in question, are on the web at...

    http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/writings/daybook.htm

    Joseph was an itinerant preacher and snakeoil salesman living in Hedley, Donley County, Texas, born Nov. 1877 in San Angelo, Texas. Clara, 12 years younger than him, was born 1 Jan. 1889 in Piggott, Arkansas and died 9 Feb. 1955 in Los Angeles.

    What I puzzles me is that during the period (no pun intended) which the above document covers, the couple had two daughters, including my grandmother, Opal Avarilla BROOKS, b. 26 Sep. 1909; and Rotha Lee BROOKS, b. 10 Aug. 1911. The last entry in the record is dated "June 24th 1913," approximately nine months prior to the birth of their last child, Talbert Walker BROOKS, b. 13 March 1913. My great-grandfather, JWB, was reportedly struck by lightning, and killed, while standing on a Texas wheat field with a jackknife in his hand on 13 Sept. 1913. The book is said to have been in his pocket at the time.

    If anybody would like to take a look at the data in the table and say what they think it might be, I'd welcome alternative hypotheses as to the meaning of these dates, other than that they reflect my great-grandmother's menstrual periods. The problem with this theory, as I just noticed, is that two children (Opal and Rotha) were born during the periods covered by the dates in the table.

    Any thoughts on what "Clara's Girl Ovations" might mean? For two decades I've interpreted it to mean "ovulations" (as stated in the editor's note on the web page), until noticing just tonight the fact that two births took place during the cycles listed in the table. It would be an odd thing indeed for a woman to give birth to two children, and all the while continue menstruating through both pregnancies!

    Anyone who recognizes any of these names is also invited to contact me.

    Warmly,
    Tom Rue@catskill.net
    http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/genealogy.htm



    X-Message: #3
    From: penny40@urs2.net (Beverly Partee)
    Subject: great grandma's book
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 20:11:56 -0700

    Tom,

    It would be unusual for a woman to continue menstruating through out her pregnancies but it does happen.

    Possibly by calculating her "time of the month" she was trying to predict when a child would be born.

    On Nigel's Rule which is what we use now days a woman cycles every 28 days. That is in general but cycles vary from 18 days to 37 days. That's why doctors give a 2 week time frame before or after the estimated date of birth.

    Woman are generally fertile 2 weeks before they menstruate. That is when they ovulate. She may have been figuring her fertile time. This was a form of birth control used by woman for eons. It's called the Rhythm method, of course it doesn't work to well.

    Since woman cycle at different times and anything can throw off a cycle.

    Woman use to write down their "time of the month" so they would know when the next one would be so they would not be out somewhere and embarrass themselves.

    I'm almost 60 and as a teenager I had my own calendar and kept very close track. Heaven forbid you would be out somewhere and not prepared.

    Since your grandfather was an traveling preacher and she probably was with him it might have been important to know about when a child would arrive etc.

    Just a few thoughts on the subject. That book is a great piece of family history to have.

    Beverly



    X-Message: #4
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 21:55:28 -0700
    From: Jim & Barb Rigel [rigel@cdsnet.net]
    Subject: Re: female question

    Hi Tom,

    I saw your msg here and was looking in the dictionary as to the meaning of the word ovation. The following is what I found:

    1. (n.) Approval expressed by clapping:

    • applause
    • hand (colloquial)
    • clapping
    • round of applause
    o·va·tion n. 1. Enthusiastic, prolonged applause. 2. A show of public homage or welcome. 3. An ancient Roman victory ceremony of somewhat less importance than a triumph. [Latin , a Roman victory ceremony, from ov³tus, past participle of ov³re, to rejoice.] --o·va“tion·al adj. A lesser triumph among the ancient Romans; triumphal reception; public marks of respect.

    Which is different from the word: Ovulation o·vu·late intr.v. o·vu·lat·ed, o·vu·lat·ing, o·vu·lates. To produce ova; discharge eggs from the ovary. [From ovule.] --o”vu·la“tion n. --o“vu·la·to”ry
    adj.

    I wonder if it was a list of dates that she did something like (public marks of respect) or one of the other meanings of the word Ovation. Could this be something connected with Church? Anyway I saw the surname MILLER and was looking because of that and got interested. Hope I do not make things worse by this.

    -Jim


    X-Message: #5
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 23:59:04 -0400
    From: "Eugene W. Hubbard" [hubfam@earthlink.net]
    Subject: A Female Question..How far we've come
    My father was a textile engineer working for the Brown Company, in Portland, Maine in a research and development capacity. Brown Company was basically in the timber products business. This was almost 70 years ago.

    I remember his raccounting that part of his job was to flush an experimental product down the toilet. Once the product was developed, the Brown Company decided it could not afford to have its name associated with such a personal product, so they sold the rights to it to a small (for then) company called Kimberly-Clarke. Its trade name, to this day, is KOTEX. Talk about corporate myopic vision!

    'Gene Hubbard :-)


    From: "Ric and Cheryl Cass"
    Subject: Your Roots Questions
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 08:27:04 -0500

    From what I have heard the women in those days used rags, which they washed out and reused. Glad we live in this day and age! Hope this helps.

    Cheryl


    From: catkinsn@ecity.net
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:11:01 -0600
    Subject: Re: female question

    Hi,

    Saw your reply to Denise Fox. If you would like to send a copy of this letter to her, as you did not give a email address, it would be fine.

    I am addressing both questions. First yours.

    As for the periods continuing during pregnancy, this is a common fact that they do not always stop. I have known several women who were mortified that they still had them, even though they were pregnant. One of my friends did not know she was pregnant till she was 7 months along. She thought she had a tumor growing and was afraid to go to the doctor. HA!! Also, they might have been practicing the rhythm method, as a ay of trying to not have too many children. I was not aware that they were that knowledgeable about it.

    As for Denise's question. When I was a little girl, I had a very interesting conversation with my grandmother regarding this very subject. I was pretty little--Tom---if you are embarressed--quit reading. Anyway, at that time, I guess there was just kotex that was popularly being used. They were HUGE and thick. Much larger than diapers today even. Anyway, I saw her take these kotex out of a closet and being nosy I asked her what they were for and what she was doing. So, being a good grandmother, she told me. So then I started asking what they did when she was a little girl.

    My grandmother told me that her mother had a special chest that she kept the softest rags made out of old clothing and sheets. These rags--she called them that--were not touched by anyone else in the house for anything else. She would keep them in this chest clean, ready to be used. When they were needed, she would take several of them, fold them and place them on herself leaving one long one to go up her front and her back. she then would tie them. Now, what I did not really realize at this time was she did not tell me what she tied them to!! The only thing I can think of is that she had one around her waist tied and then tied the other one to it front and back. She kept a pail in the outhouse filled with water and lye soap and cleaned them daily.

    My grandmother said that they were more comfortable than kotex.

    So, sorry Tom, about the explanation here.


    X-Message: #8
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:45:10 -0500
    From: sayona [sayona@telepath.com]
    Subject: Ovations

    I doubt that is a record of her menstrual cycle unless she was exteremely irregular. She notes dates that are more often every other month. Sometimes consecutive months. Sometimes skipping two months. A menstrual cycle ordinarily comprises 28 days. or once a month... varying a little of course.

    As to her pregnancy and a possible cycle. It's possible to get pregnant during part of the actual mensturation. It's also possible for someone to be "spotting" or have a small amount of menstruation during part of the pregnancy.

    Have you considered that it might be in some way actually connected to the word "ovation"?

    "Ovation \O*va"tion\, n. [L. ovatio, fr. ovare to exult, rejoice, triumph in an ovation; cf. Gr. ? to shout: cf. F. ovation.] 1. (Rom. Antiq.) A lesser kind of triumph allowed to a commander for an easy, bloodless victory, or a victory over slaves.
    2. Hence: An expression of popular homage; the tribute of the multitude to a public favorite.
    To rain an April of ovation round Their statues. --Tennyson. "
    From
    Websters

    Could it be possible that she worked with her husband either in selling or in the church? giving testimonials... etc...?

    I know these are rather wild theories, but I really doubt that those are menstural cycle dates. Why would she note those in her husband's diary?

    It's interesting, fascinating..and a real puzzle. Thank you for sharing *smile*

    Barbara Rivas
    sayona@telepath.com


    X-Message: #9
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 04:23:11, -0500
    From: PZEK81A@prodigy.com (MR ROBERT W HARRIS)
    Subject: female problems

    I thing the old saying on the rag, meant that the females used ald rags then, of course most had very few periods in that they were expecting or nursing most of their fertile life.

    ____
    Linda Harris
    1872 Regents Park Ct
    Marietta GA 30062
    770 578-0105
    Researching in eastern NC and VA and southern PA


    X-Message: #10
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:04:15 -0400
    From: "Eugene W. Hubbard" [hubfam@earthlink.net]
    Subject: Ovations

    I'm not a medical doctor, so take my observations for what they are, just a layman's.

    The word ovation (ovulation) is distinctly a technical medical term. I'm surprised it was even used in those day by a lay person, or that they realized there was a point in time to be fertile.

    Another observation. In my family, recent relatives had irregular menstrual cycles, such as has been surmised from the journal. It's also a medical fact that constant, hard exercise will postpone or exagerate the length of the cycle.

    Third, nature attempts to preserve the human species by making women more-fertile during periods of starvation. Read more "cycles" than would ordinarily be the case (from my days of college embryology). Could the obverse be true, that an obese, or a sedentary person has fewer cycles?

    So there are three reasons, one genetic, two physical, for "irregularies".

    E. Hubbard


    From: penny40@urs2.net (Beverly Partee)
    Subject: Grandma's book
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 19:04:21 -0700

    Tom,

    I don't mind if you post it but I think the answer you got on "ovation" from a couple other people is more close to what was actually going on. I hadn't even thought on those terms.

    Women did know about their fertile time. My mother talks of a wafer they made and inserted to try to prevent pregnancy. She was born in 1918. 80 and very active. My grandmother born 1884 talked about it too, so they were aware of it maybe just didn't call it ovulation.

    Beverly


    X-Message: #12
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 15:51:40 -0500
    From: "K. S. Richards" [ksrich@mindspring.com]
    Subject: Female problems

    I talked with mother who was born in 1919 and she said they used rags not only that but they had to wash them out and reuse them. My mother came from a family that by today's standards would be classified a poor. Makes me wonder what the rich people used. She also told me that was one reason she would not like to relive the good old days. Think about what they used as bandages it at a time when there was no Band-Aids.


    X-Message: #13
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:10:49 -0500 (CDT)
    From: Jeanne Lee Cunningham [jeanne@KUTELECOM.LT.UKANS.EDU]
    Subject: Clara's Girl Ovations
    I was intrigued by your post to ROOTS-L, so I went to your web site to see the original - and your transcription. To be absolutely correct, your transcription is not verbatim. You rearranged the text and left out the words, "Girl Ovation". [Note: This has been corrected. Thanks for pointing it out.] Not that I've necessarily figured anything out, yet, but maybe by seeing the original arrangement, I or someone might get some new ideas.

    Anyhow, here's my transcription:

    Jan 10th 1909 - Girl Ovation
    Mar 7th 1909 - May 2nd 1909
    June 27th 1909 - Aug 22nd 1909
    Oct 17th 1909 - Dec 12 1909
    Feb 6th 1910 - Apr 3rd 1910
    May 28th 1910 - July 24th 1910
    Sep 18th 1910 - Nov 13 1910
    Jan 8th 1911 - Ma 5th 1911
    May 1st 1911 - June 24th 1911
    Aug 21st 1911 - Oct 16th 1911
    Dec 11 1911 - Feb 5th 1912
    Apr 2nd 1912 - May 28th 1912
    July 23rd 1912 - Sep 17th 1912
    Nov 12th 1912 - Jan 7th 1913
    Mar 4th 1913 - Apr 28th 1913
    June 24th 1913

    Now for my observations/questions:

    1. When were the female children born? Was the first one in October 1909? i.e. 9 months after the "Girl Ovation" entry?

    2. Also, note that the entries are for every other month, not every month??? I realize that there are actually four times that there are entries for consecutive months, but they are all for a very early day in the first month and a very late day in the second month, always 54 to 56 days apart ( May 2nd 1909 and June 27th 1909; Apr 3rd 1910 and May 28th 1910; May 1st 1911 and June 24th 1911; Apr 2nd 1912 and May 28th 1912). Is this possibly some attempt to determine the best time to conceive a boy???

    3. I also find it interesting that the entries stop in June of 1913. For the pattern to continue, there should have been an August entry?? Since her husband was killed in September, that could explain no subsequent entries, but the "missing" August entry seems strange...

    3. Are there any clues at all in the other text of the journal??

    Just my 2 cents worth...

    **************************************************************
    Jeanne Lee Cunningham JEANNE2510@GEOCITIES.COM
    932 Lawrence Avenue jeannelc10@aol.com or jeanne@ukans.edu
    Lawrence, KS 66049 (785)841-0000 OR 843-0000 or work 864-0355
    ***** Mother's necessity IS invention. *****
    **************************************************************

    X-Message: #14
    Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 19:20:00 -0500
    From: "Tom Rue" [rue@catskill.net]
    Subject: Re: Clara's Girl Ovations

    At 10:10 AM 6/23/98 -0500, jeanne@KUTELECOM.LT.UKANS.EDU wrote concerning the web page at http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/brooks/daybook.htm :

    >Anyhow, here's my transcription:
    >
    >Jan 10th 1909 - Girl Ovation
    >Mar 7th 1909 - May 2nd 1909
    >June 27th 1909 - Aug 22nd 1909
    >Oct 17th 1909 - Dec 12 1909
    >Feb 6th 1910 - Apr 3rd 1910
    >May 28th 1910 - July 24th 1910
    >Sep 18th 1910 - Nov 13 1910
    >Jan 8th 1911 - Ma 5th 1911
    >May 1st 1911 - June 24th 1911
    >Aug 21st 1911 - Oct 16th 1911
    >Dec 11 1911 - Feb 5th 1912
    >Apr 2nd 1912 - May 28th 1912
    >July 23rd 1912 - Sep 17th 1912
    >Nov 12th 1912 - Jan 7th 1913
    >Mar 4th 1913 - Apr 28th 1913

    >June 24th 1913

    >
    >Now for my observations/questions:
    >
    >1. When were the female children born? Was the first one in
    >October 1909? i.e. 9 months after the "Girl Ovation" entry?
    Actually, you're quite close... September 26, 1909 (see group sheet below.) What do you deduce from this, if anything?

    Family Group Sheet
    ===================================================

    Husband: Joseph Winfield BROOKS
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Born: Nov 1877 in: San Angelo, Tom Greene, Texas
    Died: 13 Sep 1913 in: Hedley, Donley, Texas
    Religion: Ch. of Christ Occupation: minister, salesman

    Father: Joab W. BROOKS
    Mother: Florence Rosalee BILLINGSLEY
    ====================================================
    Wife: Clara Ada MORROW
    Married: 3 Jan 1909 in: Donley County, Texas
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Born: 1 Jan 1889 in: Piggott, Clay, Arkansas
    Died: 9 Feb 1955 in: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    Father: James Alphus MORROW
    Mother: Martha Belle FUQUA
    ====================================================
    1 - Opal Avarilla BROOKS
    F - Born: 26 Sep 1909 in: Giles, Donley, Texas
    Died: 12 Mar 1979 in: Orange, Orange, California
    ----------------------------------------------------
    2 - Rotha Lee BROOKS
    F - Born: 10 Aug 1911 in: Turkey, Hall, Texas
    ----------------------------------------------------
    3 - Talbert Walker BROOKS
    M - Born: 13 Mar 1914 in: Turkey, Donley, Texas
    Died: 28 May 1965 in: Englewood, California
    ====================================================

    Clara had one other daughter, Eunice Dean NUTT, by a later husband.

    >2. Also, note that the entries are for every other month, not every
    >month??? I realize that there are actually four times that there are
    >entries for consecutive months, but they are all for a very early day
    >in the first month and a very late day in the second month, always
    >54 to 56 days apart (May 2nd 1909 and June 27th 1909; Apr 3rd 1910
    >and May 28th 1910; May 1st 1911 and June 24th 1911; Apr 2nd 1912 and
    >May 28th 1912). Is this possibly some attempt to determine the best
    >time to conceive a boy???

    Could be, since they had two girls followed by a boy, as shown above. Perhaps the method was successful?

    >3. I also find it interesting that the entries stop in June of 1913.
    >For the pattern to continue, there should have been an August entry??
    >Since her husband was killed in September, that could explain no
    >subsequent entries, but the "missing" August entry seems strange...
    >
    > 3. Are there any clues at all in the other text of the journal??
    No. The other text on the web page is typical of the remainder of the book. Much of it consiste of mere computation, apparently scratch paper in making change.

    I'd like to thank all who took time to puzzle over the precise meaning of "Clara's girl ovations." It may remain an unsolved mystery.

    Would anyone who wrote to me on the subject object if I compiled the replies onto a page linked to the daybook webpage? If anyone wishes, I'll be happy to delete sender's name(s) and/or e-mail address(es).

    Tom - rue@catskill.net http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/genealogy.htm


    X-Message: #15
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:04:24 -0500 (CDT)
    From: Jeanne Lee Cunningham [jeanne@KUTELECOM.LT.UKANS.EDU]
    Subject: Re: Clara's Girl Ovations
    Reply-to: jeanne@KUTELECOM.LT.UKANS.EDU

    Tom, you replied:

    > >1. When were the female children born? Was the first one in
    > >October 1909? i.e. 9 months after the "Girl Ovation" entry?
    >
    > Actually, you're quite close... September 26, 1909 (see group sheet
    > below.) What do you deduce from this, if anything?
    >

    As I said, 9 months after the first entry of "Jan 10th 1909".

    > -------------------------------------------------------------------
    > 2 Rotha Lee BROOKS
    > F Born: 10 Aug 1911 in: Turkey, Hall, Texas
    > Died: in:

    Looks as if the conception of this child "fits" between the Nov 13 1910 and Jan 8th 1911 dates in the entries - maybe a first concerted effort for a male-child - if that's what this is???

    >
    > Could be, since they had two girls followed by a boy, as shown above.
    > Perhaps the method was successful?
    >

    Perhaps on the second attempt. Am also beginning to wonder if rather than a diary of occurrences, this was some sort of a projection??? a guide based on the last period occurring before the conception of the first child - that turned out to be female. Then the chart was produced, indicating the every other month "intervals" that would be the "Boy Ovations"???

    > Would anyone who wrote to me on the subject object if I compiled the
    > replies onto a page linked to the daybook webpage? If anyone wishes,
    > I'll be happy to delete sender's name(s) and/or e-mail address(es).

    I have NO problem with your using my speculations, name, email, etc.

    Jeanne
    *******************************************************************
    Jeanne Lee Cunningham - JEANNE2510@GEOCITIES.COM
    932 Lawrence Avenue - jeannelc10@aol.com or jeanne@ukans.edu
    Lawrence, KS 66049 - (785)841-0000 OR 843-0000 or work 864-0355
    ***** Mother's necessity IS invention. *****
    *******************************************************************


    X-Message: #16
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:25:34 -0500
    From: sayona [sayona@telepath.com]
    To: "ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com"
    Subject: OVation

    -------------------------------snip----------------------
    2. Also, note that the entries are for every other month, not every
    >month??? I realize that there are actually four times that there are
    >entries for consecutive months, but they are all for a very early day
    >in the first month and a very late day in the second month, always
    >54 to 56 days apart ( May 2nd 1909 and June 27th 1909; Apr 3rd 1910
    >and May 28th 1910; May 1st 1911 and June 24th 1911; Apr 2nd 1912 and
    >May 28th 1912). Is this possibly some attempt to determine the best
    >time to conceive a boy???
    -----------------------------------------snip--------------------

    What an excellent observation. And one of the best I think. I have one other wild suggestion. Could it be the times they engaged in sex? And if he wasn't there in August, or for someother reason... then that could account for the missing August entry.?

    Barbara Rivas
    sayona@telepath.com


    X-Message: #17
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:02:27 -0500
    From: sayona [sayona@telepath.com]
    Subject: Periods, Ovations, and such

    Maggie

    I think you misunderstand the purpose of asking for information that is not strictly a family line.

    --------------------------------snip------------------------

    i really am tired of hearing about womens periods and all the information about what they used and this and that. this is genealogy and we are searching for our ancestors and the events and happenings in their life. There they were from and things of this nature. and sweet stories that were left behind about them, even though some were tragic.

    ----------------------------snip-----------------------------

    Life is not "sweet" and the stories left behind are often tragic, dirty, disgusting, or any other epitaph you wish to use. But they still need to be aired. They give a feeling and a portrait of the time period in which our ancestors lived. If we didn't discuss outdoor plumbing, some people might assume that they had indoor plumbing. Which might lead them to not realize how many people died from cholera and typhoid from contaminated water supplies. Each item adds to our knowledge, whether it is something we "care to discuss" or not. My suggestion, without prejudice, would be to just skip over those articles with subject lines that perhaps would offend you. *smile*

    Barbara Rivas
    sayona@telepath.com


    X-Message: #18
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:52:00 -0400
    From: "Scott, Mark S. (RIV)" [SCOTTM@RIV.RELTECCORP.COM]
    Subject: Women's lib / What did women do before.

    I've been waiting for someone else to post this information but I guess I'll go ahead with it.

    While surfing around the other day, I ran into "The Museum of Menstruation & Women's Health" which has an extensive collection of stuff related to mensturation, pads, tampons, cloths, etc. as well as some information from ancient history on the subject. You can find it at: http://www.mum.org.


    X-Message: #19
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 19:38:25 -0500
    From: Barbara Rivas [sayona@telepath.com]
    Subject: Periods and such

    There seems to be some confusion. I received a note and I wanted to post my answer here.
    -----
    First - some seem to think it was my topic. Sorry, it wasn't. I just was one of many to answer the original query.

    Second - it was brought up that perhaps people were "old-fashioned" because of their objections. I don't think so. I think it's just a question of putting the subject into the proper context of historical research. It was also suggested that this wasn't a topic for "mixed" company. I was sorry to hear that. I think there are times and places for topics., but in a setting as this, I think it doesn't matter whether the company is mixed or not. It's again, a question of historical information.

    Third - it was suggested that genealogy should be seperate from history. That only genealogy should be discussed here. I do disagree very strongly with this. You can't in any way seperate history from genealogy. After all, genealogy is just the history of a particular line of people.

    Barbara Rivas
    sayona@telepath.com

    ps. I learned two new interesting facts out of the discussion. One was that Kimberly-Clarke did not develop and invent the tampon. The other was the information sent by the lady, who talked about the nurses in World War I. Unfortunately, these facts are seldom found in history books, and they should be. *smile*


    X-Message: #20
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 18:10:41 -0400
    From: Strephon Johnson [strephon@erols.com]
    Subject: Grandpa's problem

    Greetings,

    Would anyone like to hear about my grandfathers' enlarged prostate?

    Regards,
    Strephon Johnson
    Baltimore, MD


    X-Message: #21
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:33 EDT
    From: "John F. Chandler" [JCHBN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU]
    Subject: Re: Grandpa's problem

    Strephon Johnson wrote (intending to be rhetorical):

    > Would anyone like to hear about my grandfathers'
    > enlarged prostate?

    The answer is, yes, lots of people would. Really. The issue is whether such a discussion has any bearing on understanding the lives of other forebears who aren't available to be quizzed on the subject. Quite possible. So, if your grandfather doesn't mind, go right ahead.

    John Chandler
    (who ought to start having
    his PSA checked)


    X-Message: #22
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 10:47:48 -0700
    From: Betty Reeves
    Subject: Re: tired of female question

    I agree. I think we all have learned all we need to know about the subject and the discussion should be dropped. Or, write emails to each other without involving the rest of us.

    Thanks,
    Betty Reeves


    X-Message: #23
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:21:52 -0700
    From: penny40@urs2.net (Beverly Partee)
    Subject: Monthly pain

    I don't know for sure what was used for pain at that time of the month but back then they used Laudanum (sp) for all kinds of pain. It was an Opium derivative.

    Bev


    X-Message: #24
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 16:09:39 -0700
    From: Marie Bartholomew [mbarth@glendale.cc.ca.us]
    Subject: This Woman Thang

    Ok, I'm going to jump on this bandwagon. I agree with Tina, if it wasn't for us women and our "woman things". I consider all of this to be a part of genealogy research. I remember my grandmother talking about "coat hangers", "woman who died because they didn't want anymore children" when I was young as 8 years old. Of course, none of this made any sense at the time. However, as I started searching records, especially medical records, I just couldn't believe how many women died of self-abortions!!! This IS an important part of our past.

    Marie


    X-Message: #25
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 19:43:58 -0500
    From: "Gil & Sonia Murray" [happyman@datasync.com]
    Subject: Pain releif

    Opiates were derived from chewing poppy seeds and acetylsalicilic acid (aspirin) from chewing willow bark. Both were used for hundreds of years.

    Happy hunting,
    Gil


    X-Message: #26
    Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:10:50 -0700
    From: penny40@urs2.net (Beverly Partee)
    Subject: Grandpa's problem

    All men 35-40 should have their PSA checked on a regular basis. Or they will become an ancestor to soon.

    Beverly


    X-Message: #27
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 01:01:23 -0500
    From: LaWanda [LNEPSTAD@prodigy.net]
    Subject: RE: Clara's Girl Ovations

    Has anyone checked to see if these dates are all on the same day of the week? (i.e. Sunday?) Was it usual in that time for menstrual periods to be twice as far apart? I have never heard of this.

    I also think it would be unusual for a woman of that time period to use the term 'ovulation' if that is what was meant. I would be surprised if doctors even used the term so easily.

    This is a puzzle, indeed.

    LaWanda


    X-Message: #28
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 02:12:21 EDT
    From: ANM81935@aol.com
    Subject: GRANDPA RAY'S LITTLE OUTHOUSE

    My grandfather, HARRY H. RAY was born in 1883 in Colegrove, McKean Co., Pennsylvania. He was a carpenter in the oil fields of Pennsylvania, Kansas and Oklahoma from 1905 to 1930, building the large tank farms. In 1943, he and Grandma settled in Chillicothe, MO on a farm north of town. The farm had an old outhouse that was unsuitable for use when Grandpa Ray first moved there, so he built a new one. Oh, what an outhouse it was!

    The location was ideal, fairly close to the house and next to a large Redbud tree. The family didn't mind using Grandpa's outhouse even in the winter, because it was built better than the old farm house and a good deal warmer. He built it on a concrete foundation, with white siding, and a nice shingled roof. The door was a wooden solid core entrance door with a real door knob. Of course there was a hook to lock the door when in use. Inside, the walls were neatly wallpapered, and there were two modern toilet seats with lids. All the wood was painted white. In the winter he had a small kerosene heater to keep us snug.

    The most interesting about Grandpa Ray's little outhouse was the flushing technique. There was a waste basket in the corner that had a foot lever to depress to open the lid. The little waste basket was kept full of LIME. Two scoops of lime was equal to one flush. There was never a problem with an unsightly aroma coming from Grandpa's little outhouse. We never used oyster shells. Probably too expensive.

    The wellhouse, smokehouse and outhouse that Grandpa built are still standing today, but the old farm house has been gone for several years.

    Isn't it funny what a child will remember about Grandpa??

    Adonna Morgan


    X-Message: #29
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 02:31:00 EDT
    From: ANM81935@aol.com
    Subject: Ovation

    Ovation was a PUBLIC WELCOMING. Probably welcoming new converts or new members into the church. Check to see if all your dates were on Sunday.

    A. Morgan


    X-Message: #30
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 11:39:41 +0100
    From: "Rowe" [akrowe@clubi.ie]
    Subject: If you don't like the subject, don't read the message!

    Hi, All!

    A simple solution to the problem: if you don't like the subject, don't read the message! Meanwhile, the rest of us can learn something new, or at least get a kick out of reading something outrageous! Most of us are in this confusing, complicated, difficult hobby because it's FUN! :)

    Good Hunting,
    Kathleen


    X-Message: #31
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 11:46:41 -0500
    From: "Armond Beaty" [acbeaty@1starnet.com]
    Subject: Ovation, Outhouse?

    I just finished with Digest V98 #618. It contained several messages titled: Ovation, Outhouses, Clara's little girl ovation, Outdoor plumbing, Pain relievers and Cookbooks.

    What a great geneaology site this is, especially when it goes on for days and weeks. There is always some kicks to get on, but when do they stop? I know when they get old. I liked the one on Mason's best. Faster scrolling is in order.


    X-Message: #32
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:25:00 -0500
    Email: "Nan Harvey" [nharvey@fiona.umsmed.edu]
    Subject: Clara's girl ovations

    In reflecting on this and saying it out loud, this phrase suddenly came to me: "Standing Ovation". My dictionary says that ovation is to pay public homage or tribute.

    Perhaps Clara received applause or tribute for performing in public or at church--such as singing, recitations, etc.

    We may never know the true meaning of this. Thanks for sharing it with us on Roots-L.

    Email: nharvey@fiona.umsmed.edu
    Name: Nan Harvey
    subject: Family and local history


    X-Message: #33
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:38:27 -0500
    From: LaWanda [LNEPSTAD@prodigy.net]
    Subject: RE: Girl Ovations - I've got it! (I think, maybe..)

    Okay, here goes my daughter's theory:

    Clara and her husband somehow got the idea that if getting pregnant during one cycle produced a girl, then the next cycle would produce a boy, the next a girl etc.

    They must have known when she got pregnant with the first girl baby. So they sat down and figured out which cycles would produce girls and which would produce boys. Therefore, each date is TWO cycles apart - and supposedly keeping track of ovulation, not menstrual periods.

    The days of the week vary, from Tues to Wed to Sunday; but the number of days between each date is 56 or 57. Exactly two menstrual cycles.

    I am amazed that anyone was doing this back in 1909.

    It's still a possibility that she was speaking to girls at church meetings.

    LaWanda


    X-Message: #34
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 18:19:02 -0500
    From: LaWanda [LNEPSTAD@prodigy.net]
    Subject: RE: Pain Reliever - Monthly

    My mother recently told me a very funny story about this very thing. Seems that Great Grandma, who was tee-totaling staunch Baptist, kept a quart jar of whiskey hidden behind a loose stone in the fireplace - for medicinal purposes, you know (it was hung on a string down behind the masonry). One of her daughters was lying on the couch with cramps and Gr-Grandma was doing the wash - outside in the washpot over the fire, of course. Every time she went outside, the daughter would go take a swig of the whiskey - by the time the wash was done, she was 'feeling no pain'!

    LaWanda


    X-Message: #35
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 18:24:43 -0500
    From: LaWanda [LNEPSTAD@prodigy.net]
    Subject: RE: Enough about Female problems

    Do some of you get the list in a different way than I do? When I go to the list, I see the subjects and have to click on a number to read the message. If I did not want to read messages about "female problems" (what an archaic expression!) I would not click on that one.

    Am I missing something here?

    LaWanda


    X-Message: #36
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 19:30:42 -0700
    From: "Mary A. Murphy" [mcmurphy@ix.netcom.com]
    Subject: Female pain

    Just a bit on other remedies for the delicate female gender of old:

    I have several old bottles that once held tonics.

    Lydia Pinkhams compound, at one dollar a bottle, boasted help for the "prolapsus uteri, or falling of the womb and other female weaknesses". It also boasted a healthy percentage of alcohol.

    Another bottle, with a complete label "McElree's Wine of Cardui" or Women's Relief was used to treat menstrual irregularities, supressed or delayed menses, painful menstruation, whites, falling of the womb, and change of life. Printing on the label front instructs to "keep well corked"--wonder if that is the product or the consumer?... ;o]!!

    Smile...life is life, no matter what century you are in!

    Mary M.


    X-Message: #37
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 21:19:49 -0700
    From: "Mark Cueni" [mnhcueni@pahrump.com]
    Subject: ovations

    Come on folks. Lay this to rest. Find someone who has a dictionary, or a primary school education.
    end
    Mark and Hwaji Cueni
    mnhcueni@pahrump.com


    X-Message: #38
    Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 00:27:27 -0500
    From: "Jere Osburn" [jere@msn.com]
    Subject: RE: Pain Reliever - Monthly

    The following is an excerpt from "Letters from an American Farmer" by J. Hector St. John Crevecoeur. The subject of this particular letter is "PECULIAR CUSTOMS AT NANTUCKET" which was populated by Quaker fishermen and whalers. These letters were first published in 1782 and I would recommend them to anyone interested in the ways of life of our ancestors. The letters can be found at http://wsrv.clas.virginia.edu/~tsawyer/CREV/contents.html.

    "A singular custom prevails here among the women, at which I was greatly surprized; and am really at a loss how to account for the original cause that has introduced in this primitive society so remarkable a fashion, or rather so extraordinary a want. They have adopted these many years, the Asiatic custom of taking a dose of opium every morning; and so deeply rooted is it, that they would be at a loss how to live without this indulgence; they would rather be deprived deprived of any necessary than forego their favourite luxury. This is much more prevailing among the women than the men, few of the latter having caught the contagion; though the sheriff, whom I may call the first person in the island, who is an eminent physician beside, and whom I had the pleasure of being well acquainted with, has for many years submitted to this custom. He takes three grains of it every day after breakfast, without the effects of which, he often told me, he was not able to transact any business. It is hard to conceive how a people always happy and healthy, in consequence of the exercise and labour they undergo, never oppressed with the vapours of idleness, yet should want the fictitious effects of opium to preserve that chearfulness to which their temperance, their climate, their happy situation so justly entitle them."


    X-Message: #39
    Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1998 05:13:00 -0500
    From: Tom Rue [rue@catskill.net]
    Subject: RE: Girl Ovations - I've got it! (I think, maybe..)

    On Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:38:27 -0500, LaWanda [LNEPSTAD@prodigy.net] wrote:
    >Clara and her husband somehow got the idea that if getting pregnant
    >during one cycle produced a girl, then the next cycle would produce a
    >boy, the next a girl etc.

    This is an excellent theory, and well expressed. It seems to fit in every respect, as far as I can see. I consulted an old book on my shelf, "Dr. Hollick's Complete Work: The Origin of Life and Process of Reproduction in Plants and Animals With the Anatomy and Physiology of the Human Generative System, Male and Female, and the Causes, Prevention and Cure of the Special Diseases to Which it is Liable - A Plain, Practical Treatise, for Popular Man," 1902 edition (first published 1878.) I picked it up once at a yard sale someplace, I think.

    The 926-page tome contains a plethora of theories popular at the turn of the century concerning how to determine the gender of an child at conception. The particular idea of alternating "girl" and "boy" ovulations does not appear in the book, but other similar ideas do -- some even stranger to a modern reader. It is not hard to imagine that Clara or Jay BROOKS (my great-grandparents) might have gotten the idea proposed above from some sort of medical practitioner of the day, or even from a book. (Remember, the daybook in which the table appears makes reference to quinine, "pink tablets" and "blue tablets" which Jay apparently sold in his travels.) According to my grandmother and her sister, he was an itinerant salesman and Church of Christ minister. I have never heard that Clara was involved in the ministry, though one would think she might have been, as a minister's wife.

    It is also not hard to imagine that, after two girls, the couple might have hoped for a boy child and sought one through whatever techniques they knew. The spelling of "Ovations" might suggest that one of them spoke to someone who used a technical word which was misspelled by the listener.

    If this is what they were doing, it is interesting to note that the couple's next and last child (born nine months after the last "Ovation" listed in the table) was in fact a boy, Talbert Walker BROOKS, b. 13 March 1914 in Turkey, Donley Co., Texas. Unfortunately, chance or the Almighty decreed that a lightning bolt would prevent Jay BROOKS from laying eyes on his carefully planned unborn son. Clara had a difficult life thereafter. T. Walker BROOKS served in the armed forces in WW II, m. Goldie Lee POTTER on 30 March 1934, and d. 28 May 1965 in Englewood, California.

    >They must have known when she got pregnant with the first girl baby. So
    >they sat down and figured out which cycles would produce girls and which
    >would produce boys. Therefore, each date is TWO cycles apart - and
    >supposedly keeping track of ovulation, not menstrual periods.

    >
    >The days of the week vary, from Tues to Wed to Sunday; but the number of
    >days between each date is 56 or 57. Exactly two menstrual cycles.

    Excellent use of deductive reasoning.

    >I am amazed that anyone was doing this back in 1909.

    I am amazed at the mysteries of life, of which gender differentiation is one of many. Many thanks, and a standing ovation, to everyone who joined in considering this curious puzzle.

    Tom Rue - rue@catskill.net
    See --> http://www.catskill.net/rue/family/writings/ovations.htm <--


    X-Message: #40
    Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 23:39:18 -0500
    From: Barbara Rivas
    Subject: Remedies.."female problems" etc.

    1. Home remedies.

    My grandfather had his own recipe for a cough medicine... (My grandma was a Baptist too *grin* - no liquor in the house except for medicinal purposes) This recipe included "a bottle of good whiskey" and a quantity of "laudenum"... His recipe for a chill also needed whiskey - and included some cayenne pepper....

    2. Childhood Memories

    Teri - you are so right. Those childhood memories..and the family stories flesh out the bare branches of a tree. They make those ancestors "real" for us. If I know that my grandfather would steal a watermelon in the summer... with the other boys. then he's not such a stern figure. Or my grandma told me about "play parties" and how she got jealous watching my grandfather (before they got married) dancing with the other girls. They tell a lot.

    3. Name Change...

    people changed names for many reasons. and I don't think you needed a legal paper. Just change it. Here is where family stories and history help to flesh out the genealogy. My cousin's grandfather and a great uncle changed their names completely and moved away because they thought they had killed a man. They found out later they hadn't - the uncle changed back to the original name...but the grandfather didn't. Now...without family history, stories, memories.. they wouldn't ever have been able to trace that family tree.

    4. Ovation...

    LaWanda - good idea. I like that one too. Did you say the dates did not fall on Sundays but on misc. days of the week? That's too bad.. I liked that idea someone had of welcoming converts to the church...

    5. LaWanda -

    I have to scroll down to read each message. I guess that's how I receive it. but I scan fast... and if a message doesn't appeal to me -then I just scan past it. No big deal.

    Barbara Rivas
    sayona@telepath.com


    X-Message: #41
    Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 08:17:01 EDT

    From: JohnMxzz@aol.com

    Subject: I am amazed!!

    I am in constant amazement as to what some people feel comes under the heading of Genealogy. Being a male, I do not know all the ins and outs of what a female goes through each month with her period but I do know its not a lot of fun. I however can not figure out how this subject is connected to Genealogy and why anyone would think it's FUN to discuss.

    John


    X-Message: #42
    Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 09:08:10 -0500 (CDT)
    From: crosstich@webtv.net (Crosstitch Grandma)
    Subject: Re: ovations and orations

    Hi -- o.k, I am surprised I am doing this -- however, maybe it should be "orations" instead of "ovations". Maybe a book club (that was safe), a church group, who knows what else, that she may have been presenting a series of "ovations" to. Whaddya think?

    Mary [Crosstitch@web.net]


    X-Message: #43
    Date: Sat, 27 Jun 98 11:07:44 PDT
    From: "marjorieK"
    Subject: Re: Female pain

    > Just a bit on other remedies for the delicate female gender of old:
    >
    > I have several old bottles that once held tonics.
    > Lydia Pinkhams compound, at one dollar a bottle, boasted help for the
    > "prolapsus uteri, or falling of the womb and other female weaknesses".
    > It also boasted a healthy percentage of alcohol.

    Lydia E. Pinkhams was also supposed to be good for women who experienced difficulty in conception. There was said to be "A baby in every bottle." My mother used it many times over the years when she would have some "female problems" and I have been told to take a swallow of it several times. When my grandmother died in the early 1950's there was an old bottle of it her cupboard that my mother brought home and put in our cupboard and if I look hard enough I would probably still find it there today. It also came in tablet form as well.

    Marjorie K. Beaumariage at email beaumark@access.hky.com


    X-Message: #44
    Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 13:28:55 -0500 (CDT)
    From: "Ralph L. Vest"
    Subject: Re: cure-all

    Donald, Here in the Missouri Ozarks, we still do it. It is gathered in the late winter, or very spring, while the sap is still in the roots, and before it rises, to the trunk of the tree. Tiz good!

    Ralph Vest






    Back to Jay Brooks' Daybook